Lido on Ethereum
Scorecard
Keep track of the latest updates on how Lido is performing against its goal of being decentralized, trustless, governance-minimized and ethos-aligned with the Ethereum community.
Lido DAO’s purpose is to keep Ethereum decentralized, accessible to all, and resistant to censorship.
Lido DAO’s mission is to make staking simple, secure, and decentralized.
And the endgame is a world in which Ethereum is the co-ordination and value layer of the internet.
As the Protocol specification and related technologies evolve, the commitment to achieving a vision of trustless, governance-minimized, and ethos-aligned liquid staking remains steadfast.
The scorecard below shows how the Lido ecosystem is doing. Feedback from everyone is welcome on the research forum .
Already succeeded
Scorecard Attribute | Category | Self-Assessment | Comments |
---|---|---|---|
Operators run their own nodes (no white-labeling) | Validator set |
Good
|
|
Good performance | Validator set |
Good
|
The average performance of the Lido protocol validator set is higher than the average Network performance based on the RAVER methodology available at the moment of assessment (June 2024). |
Operators should receive enough network rewards to build a sustainable, dependable staking business | Validator set |
Good
|
|
Withdrawal requests are automatically fulfilled | Validator set |
Good
|
The Lido protocol has a subsystem which can self-execute withdrawals with no human participation, apart from requiring Node Operators to maintain tooling (their own or open-source alternatives ) to process requests (semi-)automatically. This subsystem ensures withdrawal requests can’t be cancelled (within a bounded period of time) and is designed to work even during chaotic tail-risk scenarios. The total volume of withdrawals processed since May (withdrawals implementation) can be found on the dedicated Dune dashboard . |
No operator has more than 1% of the total stake | Validator set |
Good
|
As of Q1/2024, all operators have less than 1% of the total stake. Quarterly updates on the details and ratio of amount of stake that is over the soft-ceiling can be found in the Lido Validator and Node Operator Metrics (VaNOM) web-app . |
Lido Protocol governance lives on Ethereum | Security |
Good
|
Ethereum community potentially could change the protocol with an emergent hard-fork (if there is a consensus to do it) that changes a few bits in the governance contract to revoke the DAO’s oversight permissions. |
Lido Protocol is easy to fork | Security |
Good
|
Open-source development enables Lido protocol clone deployment and running without any DAO votes or third-party permissions. |
Withdrawal credentials are non-custodial being managed by a smart-contact maintained by LDO tokenholders | Security |
Good
|
All Lido on Ethereum participating validators use 0x01 (smart contract) withdrawal credentials. |
Smart contracts are shielded using best-in-class security standards | Security |
Good
|
The currently deployed protocol version (Lido V2) is audited by four independent top-tier audit providers: Statemind , Certora , Hexens , Oxorio . There is a formal verification executed by Certora (see the report above). All protocol levers are documented and reviewed by Statemind, see . Last but not least, every protocol upgrade and voting is a subject of running full-blown regression test suite . |
Distributed variation of on-premise infra and cloud providers | Validator set |
Good
|
Reliance on public cloud services has decreased significantly from 45%-50% in Q4/2023 to 38%-40% in Q1/2024. The majority of Node Operators now utilize some form of Bare Metal (Colocated, On-Premises or Dedicated hardware). Details can be found in the Lido VaNOM web-app . |
Client Diversity | Validator set |
Good
|
As at Q4/2023, Node Operators using the Lido protocol continue to utilize a well-balanced suite of Consensus Layer clients in aggregate. Execution Layer diversity significantly improved as a result of Node Operator commitments to reduce their reliance on Geth as a supermajority client . Geth usage is currently at 46% over the curated set. |
Delegation is enabled in on-chain governance | Governance |
Good
|
The delegation is enabled on both voting platforms the Lido DAO uses: Snapshot and Aragon |
The average performance of the Lido protocol validator set is higher than the average Network performance based on the RAVER methodology available at the moment of assessment (June 2024).
The Lido protocol has a subsystem which can self-execute withdrawals with no human participation, apart from requiring Node Operators to maintain tooling (their own or open-source alternatives ) to process requests (semi-)automatically. This subsystem ensures withdrawal requests can’t be cancelled (within a bounded period of time) and is designed to work even during chaotic tail-risk scenarios. The total volume of withdrawals processed since May (withdrawals implementation) can be found on the dedicated Dune dashboard .
As of Q1/2024, all operators have less than 1% of the total stake. Quarterly updates on the details and ratio of amount of stake that is over the soft-ceiling can be found in the Lido Validator and Node Operator Metrics (VaNOM) web-app .
Ethereum community potentially could change the protocol with an emergent hard-fork (if there is a consensus to do it) that changes a few bits in the governance contract to revoke the DAO’s oversight permissions.
Open-source development enables Lido protocol clone deployment and running without any DAO votes or third-party permissions.
All Lido on Ethereum participating validators use 0x01 (smart contract) withdrawal credentials.
The currently deployed protocol version (Lido V2) is audited by four independent top-tier audit providers: Statemind , Certora , Hexens , Oxorio .
There is a formal verification executed by Certora (see the report above). All protocol levers are documented and reviewed by Statemind, see .
Last but not least, every protocol upgrade and voting is a subject of running full-blown regression test suite .
Reliance on public cloud services has decreased significantly from 45%-50% in Q4/2023 to 38%-40% in Q1/2024. The majority of Node Operators now utilize some form of Bare Metal (Colocated, On-Premises or Dedicated hardware). Details can be found in the Lido VaNOM web-app .
As at Q4/2023, Node Operators using the Lido protocol continue to utilize a well-balanced suite of Consensus Layer clients in aggregate. Execution Layer diversity significantly improved as a result of Node Operator commitments to reduce their reliance on Geth as a supermajority client . Geth usage is currently at 46% over the curated set.
The delegation is enabled on both voting platforms the Lido DAO uses: Snapshot and Aragon
Doing well, but can improve
Scorecard Attribute | Category | Self-Assessment | Comments |
---|---|---|---|
Distributed geographically | Validator set |
Okay
|
As at Q1/2024, less than 22% of validators are currently with North-America (US+Canada) based Node Operators, but there remains an over-reliance on European based entities. Improvements have been noted in not only the addition of Asian and South American-based operators, but also the distribution of validators across under-represented geographies. However, the DAO can continue to promote geographical diversity latest stats can be found here . |
Best practices in security and key management | Validator set |
Okay
|
In the Curated Operator module, keys are managed by professional node operators. As of the Q1/24, 25.2% of validators in the module utilize Attestant’s Vouch CL client. While Vouch utilization does not directly correlate to usage of Attestants Dirk key manager that includes threshold signing, it is roughly indicative. In the Simple DVT Module, participants utilize Obol and SSV Network based DVT. All validator keys are created through a Distributed Key Generation process, with no single Node Operator controlling a full private key at any point of their existence. |
Node operators are disincentivized from acting maliciously | Validator set |
Okay
|
Currently, if Node Operators don’t process exits on time (in other words, try to block users from obtaining their withdrawn ETH), they suffer penalties (automatically enforced by the protocol, as well as reputational). There have been 0 incidents of non-exit, and one case of delay . Triggerable execution layer exits , expected in late 2024/early 2025, will make it possible to exit validators based on a DAO vote. |
Lido DAO can’t suddenly change the validator set | Validator set |
Okay
|
As it stands, LDO holders cannot force Node operators to exit. Even if triggerable exits were live today, it would still take the DAO half a year, at a minimum, to rotate all validators (due to the mechanics of how the staking queue works). In order to create additional checks and balances on Lido governance, dual governance proposed . It gives stakers ability to withdraw their Eth in the event of a proposal that would change the validator set, while also enabling them to express concerns about it. Onchain vote to deploy expected in Q4 2024. |
There’s a robust set of governance delegates | Governance |
Okay
|
The Delegate platform is set up with 36 applications listed for the first round of Delegate Incentivization Program. The delegates applied show different viewpoints and expertize. The potential improvements account for the more voting power getting delegated to the public delegates. |
As at Q1/2024, less than 22% of validators are currently with North-America (US+Canada) based Node Operators, but there remains an over-reliance on European based entities. Improvements have been noted in not only the addition of Asian and South American-based operators, but also the distribution of validators across under-represented geographies. However, the DAO can continue to promote geographical diversity latest stats can be found here .
In the Curated Operator module, keys are managed by professional node operators. As of the Q1/24, 25.2% of validators in the module utilize Attestant’s Vouch CL client. While Vouch utilization does not directly correlate to usage of Attestants Dirk key manager that includes threshold signing, it is roughly indicative. In the Simple DVT Module, participants utilize Obol and SSV Network based DVT. All validator keys are created through a Distributed Key Generation process, with no single Node Operator controlling a full private key at any point of their existence.
Currently, if Node Operators don’t process exits on time (in other words, try to block users from obtaining their withdrawn ETH), they suffer penalties (automatically enforced by the protocol, as well as reputational). There have been 0 incidents of non-exit, and one case of delay . Triggerable execution layer exits , expected in late 2024/early 2025, will make it possible to exit validators based on a DAO vote.
As it stands, LDO holders cannot force Node operators to exit. Even if triggerable exits were live today, it would still take the DAO half a year, at a minimum, to rotate all validators (due to the mechanics of how the staking queue works). In order to create additional checks and balances on Lido governance, dual governance proposed . It gives stakers ability to withdraw their Eth in the event of a proposal that would change the validator set, while also enabling them to express concerns about it. Onchain vote to deploy expected in Q4 2024.
The Delegate platform is set up with 36 applications listed for the first round of Delegate Incentivization Program. The delegates applied show different viewpoints and expertize. The potential improvements account for the more voting power getting delegated to the public delegates.
Needs Improvement
These attributes need work, and below is information about what contributors are already doing as solutions and improvements.
Improvement proposals and comments are welcome from anyone.
Scorecard Attribute | Category | Self-Assessment | Comments |
---|---|---|---|
Governance has significant safeguards | Governance |
Needs improvement
|
The governance process includes 3 steps: discussion, off-chain vote, and on-chain execution which make all changes publicly socialized before implementation.
|
There is a way for stakers to resist malicious governance capture | Governance |
Needs improvement
|
Lido on Ethereum, governed by LDO token voting, manages various aspects including the treasury, withdrawal keys, and lists of nodes or oracles, effectively granting root access to the voting app. Dual governance allows stakers to withdraw their Eth in the event of a contentious proposal, while also enabling them to express concerns about its contentiousness. When a specified amount of stETH accumulates in the DG veto vault, execution of LDO governance motions is paused unless the stETH in the vault is withdrawn. The design includes multiple safeguards and potential de-escalation mechanisms. A Snapshot vote on this proposal passed , with on-chain deployment slated for Q4 2024. |
There’s a way for operators to permissionlessly enter the set and prove themselves | Validator set |
Needs improvement
|
Lido V2’s Staking Router is a controller contract which paves the way for permissionless operators to join Lido’s validator set. The first permissionless module called CSM is now deployed on the testnet and planned to be proposed to on-chain vote by the end of 2024. |
The governance process includes 3 steps: discussion, off-chain vote, and on-chain execution which make all changes publicly socialized before implementation.
A two-step Aragon voting is used with objection periods, where only 'against' votes are possible in the second phase.
Currently, operators act as a check on LDO power since they cannot be forced to exit.
Dual governance
allows stakers to withdraw their Eth in the event of a contentious proposal, while also enabling them to express concerns about its contentiousness. Onchain vote to deploy expected in Q4 2024.
Lido on Ethereum, governed by LDO token voting, manages various aspects including the treasury, withdrawal keys, and lists of nodes or oracles, effectively granting root access to the voting app. Dual governance allows stakers to withdraw their Eth in the event of a contentious proposal, while also enabling them to express concerns about its contentiousness. When a specified amount of stETH accumulates in the DG veto vault, execution of LDO governance motions is paused unless the stETH in the vault is withdrawn. The design includes multiple safeguards and potential de-escalation mechanisms. A Snapshot vote on this proposal passed , with on-chain deployment slated for Q4 2024.
Lido V2’s Staking Router is a controller contract which paves the way for permissionless operators to join Lido’s validator set. The first permissionless module called CSM is now deployed on the testnet and planned to be proposed to on-chain vote by the end of 2024.